Tuesday, December 10, 2013

To Breath or Not to Breath



Week 8 Blog Post


1) Select only ONE of the following environmental stresses: (a) heat, (b) high levels of solar radiation, (c) cold, or (d) high altitude. Discuss specifically how this environmental stress negatively impacts the survival of humans by disturbing homeostasis.

The environmental stress I chose is (d) high altitude. 
While there are two different kinds of altitude changes with hot days/cold nights, strong winds/humidity low and low air pressure, I am focusing on the low air pressure that happens in higher mountain regions.

While the oxygen level at an altitude of 2 miles is the same than at sea level, the air pressure drops by 30%.  This causes the body to not be able to have oxygen enter the vascular system as easily as it did at sea level. As a result, the person will feel fatigue, and at high altitude may have a loss of appetite, vomiting, headaches, which are symptoms of hypoxia (oxygen deprivation). The body tries to counter with a physiological response by increasing the breathing, but that can cause heart failure.
Prolonged hypoxia will eventually lead to the death of the person, unless oxygen is provided.

2) Identify 4 ways in which humans have adapted to this stress, choosing one specific adaptation from each of the different types of adaptations listed above (short term, facultative, developmental and cultural. Include images of adaptation.

In regards to high altitude the short term adaptation or initial physiological response for an individual that is new to high altitude would be increase in ventilation (breathing faster and deeper), which causes an increase in the heart rate as well as an increase in blood pressure.Another way is to slow down activities and rest to not put the body under more stress.

This adaptation will change as soon as the environmental stress is removed. 

             
 



                               Increased heart rate and blood pressure by breathing faster
 
The facultative adaptation to high altitude would be that the body acclimatizes to the environment. It would do so by producing more red blood cells that help carry more oxygen throughout the body. Bringing more blood throughout the body will help with the fatigue and headaches. The lungs increase to allow the osmosis of oxygen and carbon monoxide to take place. This adaptation is only going to go away once the environmental stress is removed, however it takes longer than the actual short term adaptation to vanish. 

 

One developmental adaptation to high altitude would be the increased production of hemoglobin to help carry increased oxygen levels that can be carried by the blood.  This adaptation was observed in people living in the Andes of Bolivia and Peru and the population has lived there for over 2,000 years. 

                                                       Aymara Woman in Peru Mountain


Another developmental adaptation would be the change of the DNA of a population, such as increasing the size of the heart and lungs. This happened to the people of Tibet and Nepal, both of whom are living in the Asian Himalayas for generations. This happened, because the population adapted by breathing faster, yet not increasing their hemoglobin levels. The DNA test of a man from Tibet showed that he had 10 more oxygen processing genes that a person living at sea level. Those genes will be passed on to his offspring, as it is very beneficial for the climate he lives in.

                                                          Image of a man in Tibet

The cultural adaptation to high altitude and low air pressure is the use of oxygen masks. They are used by mountain climbers that otherwise would (usually) not reach the top of a mountain alive. I say usually, because I remember that mountain climber Reinhold Messner and Peter Haberle, climbed Mount Everest in 1978 without the help of any oxygen tanks.
 



                                 The use of oxygen tanks in 1933 (above) and now (below)




3. What are the benefits of studying human variations from this perspective across environmental clines? Can information from explorations like this be useful to help us in any way? Offer one example how this information can be used in a productive way.

The benefits of studying human variations is to find out what we can and cannot do under certain environmental conditions. Having this knowledge prevents people from entering regions that they might not be suited for or need equipment for. It also helps people that might get altitude sickness to use all kinds of remedies to adjust to the low air pressure.
The Olympic Teams of the United States has a training facility in Colorado that uses the physiological benefits, such as producing more hemoglobin, during competition. The effects wear of within a few weeks, so studying the human variation helped to determine how long they should stay in the camp and when they should leave it to enter the competition.

4. How would you use race to understand the variation of the adaptation listed in #2? Explain why the study of environmental influences on adaptation is a better way to understand human variation than by the use of race.

A race of a population does not influence the adaptations to high altitude conditions and low air pressure, which is the environmental stress I chose. Race plays a part in the adaptation to high levels of solar radiation, e.g. white and African American.
It is better to study the environmental influences on adaptation rather than the use of race to understand the human variation, because not all of them, such as my choice, are influenced by race.

6 comments:

  1. Great opening discussion on your stress and its repercussions. You have detailed explanations of each type of adaptations, particularly the developmental adaptations found in different populations, demonstrating that there is more than one way to solve an environmental problem.

    I want to focus on your final section a bit here. You say:

    "Race plays a part in the adaptation to high levels of solar radiation, e.g. white and African American. "

    How does race play a part here? Remember that race is just a system of classification and it is based upon superficial traits (such as skin color). Do all cultures have the same system of race classification? Is a race catagory based upon objective standards or are they subjective and affected by bias and cultural beliefs?

    I think what you meant to say there was that skin color plays a role, not race. Make sure that you understand the difference between those two statements (but even that places the causal direction backward) Race doesn't cause or influence anything. It is just a biased system of organizing people into groups. A person's skin tone, on the other hand, has been shaped by the environment. That is why you can use the environment to explain a person's skin color. Race explains nothing because it causes nothing. Does that make sense?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Professor,
    I did mean skin color. It is easy to mix this up, which I have done. Race, as you mentioned, is man made and as the literature said in previous times race was determined by region and language, not skin color. I think some cultures, like India perhaps, divide 'race' by the social standards (casts).
    Yes, it makes sense that the environment can explain the skin color and race does not. Thanks for correcting this, as it is important I don't make this mistake going forward. So my statement should have been "Skin color plays a part in the adaptation to high levels of solar radiation e.g. white and African American."
    Best,
    Andrea

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello Andrea,
    Nice work on your choice of the environmental stress of high altitude and how you narrowed it down and focused on one, low air pressure. I picked cold. so it was nice to read your assignment and learn something different from my own work.
    jennifer hernandez

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Jennifer.
    thanks for your comment. I read yours and the cold issue is very important I think as well. I am up in the Sequoia national forest a lot and working at 7,000 feet on the mountain is a task at times. I even had to get a cookbook about High Altitude baking. :-) Thanks for following my post throughout the semester. I enjoyed reading yours.

    Best,
    Andrea

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Jennifer,
    Your post was super informative! I choose your post because I did not pick altitude for #1. The info totally hits home with me because I live at 6000 ft elevation and have seen oxygen deprivation before. It was awesome to learn that people that live in higher elevations probably have bigger hearts. Also I liked how you included the fact that oxygen tanks are not a necessity when climbing large mountains. It tells us how awesome Reinhold Messner and Peter Haberle were. Great Job!

    ReplyDelete